It’s private. Once more.
Lower than a yr after her courtroom defeat over a €13 billion case towards Apple’s tax affairs in Eire, the EU’s prime antitrust enforcer Margrethe Vestager is as soon as once more taking goal on the iPhone maker.
This time, Vestager is focusing on considered one of CEO Tim Cook dinner’s crown jewels: Apple’s App Retailer.
In prices introduced on Friday, the Danish politician accused the iPhone maker of abusing a dominant place to distort competitors within the music streaming market, handing an early win to the chief complainant within the case, Sweden-based Spotify.
The case marks a return to middle stage for Vestager, who has suffered a string of defeats in EU courts on a few of her flagship circumstances, together with the landmark showdown with Apple.
Nevertheless it’s additionally set to revive a tense dynamic between the European enforcer and Cook dinner, which famously exploded into public acrimony in 2016 when she introduced her resolution towards Apple within the tax case.
“It’s maddening, it’s disappointing, it’s clear that this comes from a political place, it has no foundation in truth or legislation,” Cook dinner stated on the time. “It’s complete political crap.” (He was to be vindicated when the bloc’s prime courtroom overturned the tax resolution final yr. Vestager’s workplace is interesting the ruling.)
This time round, Cook dinner has prevented commenting publicly on the Fee’s new case. However amid a flaming public relations struggle between Apple and different tech firms, particularly Fb, over modifications to its App Retailer, the newest prices are set to crank up the temperature as soon as once more.
Certainly, Vestager’s new case takes goal at a key income for Apple — the way it prices app builders to be featured in its App Retailer, its second-most profitable enterprise after promoting iPhones.
“Our preliminary discovering is that Apple is a gatekeeper to customers of iPhones and iPads through the App Retailer,” Vestager stated on Friday at a information convention unveiling the costs. “Apple deprives customers of cheaper music-streaming selections and distorts competitors.”
Disputed practices embody charging excessive fee charges on every transaction of rivals within the App Retailer and stopping rivals from informing clients of other subscription choices.
Apple now has the chance to reply to the antitrust prices, which may result in settlement negotiations or the Fee pushing forward with a superb and an order to vary practices.
However Vestager just isn’t able to relaxation with only one case.
The Fee final yr concurrently launched two different investigations into Apple’s App Retailer — one regarding e-books and audiobooks, the opposite on competing apps in Video games and iCloud. Individually, it launched an investigation into Apple Pay.
“This isn’t the final case that we are going to have in relation to the App Retailer,” Vestager advised reporters on Friday.
For Apple the declare by Spotify — considered one of Europe’s most profitable, if not solely, streaming platforms — that it was harmed by the App Retailer insurance policies doesn’t sq. with the service’s reputation.
“On the core of this case is Spotify’s demand they need to be capable to promote various offers on their iOS app, a follow that no retailer within the world permits,” an Apple spokesperson stated.
“As soon as once more, they need all the advantages of the App Retailer however don’t assume they need to should pay something for that. The Fee’s argument on Spotify’s behalf is the alternative of truthful competitors.”
Cook dinner has to date prevented remark. For now.
Simon Van Dorpe contributed reporting.
Need extra evaluation from POLITICO? POLITICO Professional is our premium intelligence service for professionals. From monetary companies to commerce, know-how, cybersecurity and extra, Professional delivers actual time intelligence, deep perception and breaking scoops you might want to maintain one step forward. Electronic mail [email protected] to request a complimentary trial.