Whereas Teets was off obligation on the time of the incident, Schuetz was not. Beaverton police Sgt. Kevin MacDonald stated by failing to arrest Teets, Schuetz “prevented the investigation from taking place.” On account of the incident that “terrorized” a household, Teets was later charged with second-degree legal mischief and second-degree disorderly conduct. Forest Grove police officers then requested the Beaverton Police Division to analyze Schuetz’s involvement in November.
Whereas Teets was positioned on administrative desk obligation throughout investigations, Schuetz is at present on paid administrative depart—regardless of being indicted on legal expenses, based on Forest Grove Police officers. The investigations proceed per a lawsuit filed by Mirella Castaneda, one of many dwelling’s residents, who believes that her home was focused “due to her private and political views.” When reached for a remark relating to the arrests, Castaneda famous that the arrest itself doesn’t resolve the difficulty at hand.
“I’m glad that persons are lastly asking the questions that must be requested,” Castaneda informed the Portland Tribune. “Hopefully because of this individuals care sufficient to know the way their regulation enforcement departments are literally conducting enterprise, and ensuring that they’re doing it the precise method.”
In keeping with the Portland Tribune, Teets was reported to be “extremely intoxicated” through the Oct. 31 incident and the responding officer didn’t activate their body-worn digital camera regardless of division coverage. In keeping with a Washington County Sheriff’s Workplace memo, Teets didn’t even acknowledge his colleagues and “squared up” in a combating stance when first approached by them. Investigations solely started after the incident was reported to a supervisor by one other officer on name.
In keeping with Castaneda’s lawsuit, responding officers didn’t even examine Teets for weapons. She wasn’t even informed Teets was a police officer, The Washington Put up reported. It was solely when she googled his title that she discovered the person who harassed her household was a police officer close by. Her legal professionals argue that this lack of understanding, the failure to doc attainable political motives, and the officers’ unwillingness to activate physique cameras should be investigated.
“The remedy of Ms. Castaneda as a second-class citizen primarily based on her political viewpoint by the investigating officers added insult to damage, and additional compounded the emotional trauma she and her household had skilled by the hands of Officer Teets,” her lawyer stated.
Whereas Castaneda has not gotten the solutions she wants, she hopes that higher coverage, actions, and procedures will comply with this case.
“Hopefully justice is served on this case, however greater than something, I hope this can be a likelihood for the police to be extra clear sooner or later,” Castaneda informed the Portland Tribune. “Transparency and accountability is basically what individuals need from their police division.”
The case itself has raised questions on how the remedy of regulation enforcement officers differs from civilians in legal instances. The truth that an off-duty officer was pushed dwelling as a substitute of to the police division after harassing a household is past understanding. Teets’ actions weren’t solely inappropriate as an officer, however as a human generally. Had the flag represented one thing else, the scenario may need been completely different. Sadly, such incidents involving the Black Lives Matter flag are far too frequent. In a number of incidents, people have focused properties and harassed households exterior of which the flag has been displayed. These people have confronted expenses starting from hate crimes to legal expenses. Cops shouldn’t stroll free or be given particular remedy for terrorizing a household or caving in to their fragile egos triggered by actions to carry them accountable.