Bloomberg/Bloomberg through Getty Photographs
A federal choose has dismissed a lawsuit introduced by 117 workers at Houston Methodist Hospital who have been suing the hospital system over its COVID-19 vaccine requirement.
In a five-page ruling issued Saturday, U.S. District Decide Lynn Hughes upheld the hospital’s vaccination coverage, saying the requirement broke no federal regulation.
“This isn’t coercion,” stated Hughes. “Methodist is attempting to do their enterprise of saving lives with out giving them the COVID-19 virus. It’s a alternative made to maintain workers, sufferers, and their households safer.”
The choice marked the newest growth in a standoff that started in April when Houston Methodist introduced that every one workers can be required to be vaccinated in opposition to COVID-19 by June 7. The hospital says that almost all of its roughly 26,000 workers agreed to the coverage, however suspended almost 200 workers members with out pay for refusing to conform.
The 178 workers suspended by the hospital argue that the vaccines are unsafe and even “experimental.” The hospital has responded by saying that a whole lot of tens of millions of vaccine doses have been safely administered after a vetting course of that included three rounds of scientific trials.
The choose in contrast the problem to a press launch
In his ruling, Decide Hughes referred to as the plaintiffs’ declare that presently out there COVID-19 vaccines are “experimental and harmful” an argument that’s each false and irrelevant. “Texas regulation solely protects workers from being terminated for refusing to commit an act carrying felony penalties to the employee,” Hughes wrote, including that the “press-release type of the grievance” fails to specify what unlawful acts the plaintiffs have been alleged to have been requested to carry out.
“Receiving a COVID-19 vaccination just isn’t an unlawful act, and it carries no felony penalties,” the choose wrote.
The choose additionally denounced the plaintiffs for equating the vaccine mandate to pressured experimentation by the Nazis in opposition to Jewish individuals through the Holocaust. “Equating the injection requirement to medical experimentation in focus camps is reprehensible,” Hughes stated. “Nazi medical doctors carried out medical experiments on victims that brought about ache, mutilation, everlasting incapacity, and in lots of circumstances, demise.”
Houston Methodist has been among the many first hospitals within the nation to require workers to be inoculated in opposition to the coronavirus, and the choose’s determination marked an early check of how challenges to related bans might maintain up within the courts.
The plaintiffs say their battle is not over
Jared Woodfill, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs, advised NPR they are not performed “preventing this unjust coverage.” In a written assertion, he stated his purchasers are dedicated to interesting the choice.
“What’s surprising is that a lot of my purchasers have been on the entrance line treating COVID-positive sufferers at Texas Methodist Hospital through the peak of the pandemic,” he stated. “In consequence, a lot of them contracted COVID-19. As a thanks for his or her service and sacrifice, Methodist Hospital awards them a pink slip and sentences them to chapter.”
Houston Methodist welcomed the choice, writing in an announcement on Saturday that it was “happy and reassured after U.S. District Decide Lynn Hughes immediately dismissed a frivolous lawsuit filed by some workers who fought our COVID-19 vaccine mandate.”