Within the video she posted on the corporate’s inner web site, she accused her boss, recognized in media studies by his surname, Wang, of attacking her in a lodge within the metropolis of Jinan after a drunken night with an organization consumer, whom she additionally accused of sexual assault. She stated that she had reported the assault to the corporate however nobody acted, prompting her to go public.
Prosecutors in Jinan investigated her accusation however introduced in September that they’d not file costs towards Mr. Wang as a result of his habits didn’t represent against the law. The opposite man, who has been recognized in police statements by his final title, Zhang, remains to be reported to be underneath investigation for his position within the occasions that evening.
The choice to not prosecute Mr. Wang introduced extra consideration to the case. Its notoriety was fueled by Alibaba’s prominence and, maybe, by the federal government marketing campaign towards it and its founder, Mr. Ma.
When Ms. Zhou’s accusation went public, Alibaba stated the corporate had “a zero-tolerance coverage towards sexual misconduct” and vowed it could write an specific coverage towards sexual harassment and create a devoted channel for workers to report incidents of misconduct.
Now, in keeping with her dismissal letter, the corporate, too, faces authorized penalties. It didn’t specify a case, however Mr. Wang’s spouse has stated publicly that she meant to sue over his dismissal.
The letter advised that the corporate had sought Ms. Zhou’s cooperation, providing to cowl the price of lawyer charges and psychological session. It stated that she had not responded. Nor did she reply to what gave the impression to be an effort to barter her termination.
Ultimately, nevertheless, the corporate cited her unique accusation as grounds for dismissal, noting an article within the firm’s code of conduct: “Publishing or disseminating inappropriate remarks to the surface world, or intentionally fabricating or disseminating fictitious details, or disseminating unconfirmed info, inflicting unhealthy affect.”
Claire Fu contributed analysis.